You got better, but people have changed, they don't like just voice acting anymore, with no animation, it's probably that they got bored and rated it low.
"You can know the name of a bird in all the languages of the world, but when you're finished, you'll know absolutely nothing whatever about the bird... So let's look at the bird and see what it's doing - that's what counts." Richard Feynman.
Age 41, Male
Joined on 1/14/03
You got better, but people have changed, they don't like just voice acting anymore, with no animation, it's probably that they got bored and rated it low.
That's an excellent point.
stealthsilent
http://vert.newgrounds.com/news/post/702860#comments was alright, I can feel you forcing the words on most of the script, or maybe I'm just a cynic, if I am, just ignore me.
http://vert.newgrounds.com/news/post/702860#comments was a little better
http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/415212 was much, much better than the first two in acting, expect for the stuttering man, it wasn't as smooth. But the accents were not excelent. But it is believable, good job.
http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/340803 the stuttering voice was better in this one. Acting is still like the 3rd one, maybe a little better. The accents are the same. If you can, do better accents while still putting your emotions into it.
Vert
Thanks! Like I said in your review, I think you've got it spot-on.